See here. Friedman, like most commentators, acknowledges Sistani’s Shi’ism, but fails to understand what that means. “People power” as he describes is what the Ithna’shari conception of the state was/is prior to Khomeinism taking center stage. The idea of jurists leading the state, vilayat-e faqih, is a relatively new concept, but it’s already become normative for even op-ed writers who supposedly have the time to be able to think.
Related Posts
It’s just getting freakier
According to Josh Marshall, the man who thinks I’m Satan is in charge of interrogations in Iraq. If you had Satan in your custody, what would you do to him? Abu Ghuraib is his answer.
It’s amazing what turns up
I went searching for an article entitled “Counterterrorism at Miami Airport” by Ali Mazrui, and found it at Swahili On-line (asante sana). It was attached to an article about Islam in East Africa. Both are worth a read. The link is here. I like Dr. Mazrui’s writings quite a bit because he treats Islam as part of the African cultural landscape, rather than something foreign that can be separated out and potentially removed.
Mehta on Mumbai
Suketu Mehta, author of the magnificent Maximum City: Bombay Lost and Found, has a moving Op-Ed in the NYT about the Mumbai tragedies. Anna at Sepia Mutiny does a close reading of the text. Both are worth your time. Mumbai
6 thoughts on “Friedman on Sistani and the Nobel”
Comments are closed.
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus