See here. Friedman, like most commentators, acknowledges Sistani’s Shi’ism, but fails to understand what that means. “People power” as he describes is what the Ithna’shari conception of the state was/is prior to Khomeinism taking center stage. The idea of jurists leading the state, vilayat-e faqih, is a relatively new concept, but it’s already become normative for even op-ed writers who supposedly have the time to be able to think.
Related Posts
Out of Context
One of the things that happens after a terrorist bombing committed by those who claim to be Muslim is that Islamophobes start quoting the Qur’an out of context saying that Islam is a violent religion dedicated to taking over the world and enslaving everyone else (yes, it is the Protocols of the Elders of Zion revisited). I’m waiting for the day when some Islamophobe says the proof that Islam is Judeophobic is that Muslims revere a prophet named Isa who entered a synagogue and flipped over tables and drove people out claiming that they were practicing a false religion. It…
The Taliban Party né The Republican Party
Juan Cole on the Schiavo case. A must read.
How To Talk To A Jihadist – The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan
How To Talk To A Jihadist – The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan . To see political leaders in the West have such a low view of the American judicial system and such an elevated view of the world-historical significance of these pathetic, twisted, religious nutjobs…well, they look like a bunch of scaredy cats to me.
6 thoughts on “Friedman on Sistani and the Nobel”
Comments are closed.
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus