See here. Friedman, like most commentators, acknowledges Sistani’s Shi’ism, but fails to understand what that means. “People power” as he describes is what the Ithna’shari conception of the state was/is prior to Khomeinism taking center stage. The idea of jurists leading the state, vilayat-e faqih, is a relatively new concept, but it’s already become normative for even op-ed writers who supposedly have the time to be able to think.
Related Posts
Radicalizing
Follow the link to Krugman’s piece. Down the memory hole is right. As Krugman says, the period leading up to the Iraq war was indeed a radicalizing experience. I think there were plenty of people like me who had a degree of faith in elite opinion, in the sensible people in nice suits, which I never will again. And those people hate the dirty fucking hippies more than ever for the simple crime of being correct. [From Radicalizing]
Ignoring Guantanamo
See the Columbia Journalism Review for the complicity of the news media in creating Guantanamo. Technorati Tags: Guantanamo
Mayor Mike Make #NYC Proud
NYC.gov. The attack was an act of war – and our first responders defended not only our City but also our country and our Constitution. We do not honor their lives by denying the very Constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor their lives by defending those rights – and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked.
6 thoughts on “Friedman on Sistani and the Nobel”
Comments are closed.
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus