According to the American Street, there’s a library out in Washington that’s standing up to the Patriot Act. Drop them a line and say “thanks,” and if you’re capable, drop them a couple of bucks as well.
Related Posts
From mystical timeless to today’s timely
Religion News Service | Blogs | Omid Safi – What Would Muhammad Do? | From mystical timeless to today’s timely. How to take the timeless language of classical Islamic mysticism, and express in it 21st century American English is something that takes heart and soul, intellect and craft, and Alexis York Lumbard’s beautiful Conference of the Birds is indeed rich with all these qualities. Lumbard's work is beautifully illustrated by the incomparable Demi. The result is a stunning work of art that speaks to all who are spiritually seeking, no matter what their age.
Free Book: “Dis-Orienting Rhythms” available for download
I love this book. I had just written an article on treating Fun^Da^Mental as part of the South Asian literary tradition (unpublished) about three months before this book came out in print. It’s a wonderful collection of essays, and they don’t all agree with one another. It’s a shame it’s out of print, because I think it’s a classic in the field, but I’m glad they’ve made it available for download. I learned about this book over ten years ago from Tony Mitchell, and have found it invaluable. I urge anyone interested in BrAsian politics and culture, fans of Fun’Da’Mental,…
Responding to the unthinkable
An op-ed in today’s Boston Globe led me to the book Responsa to the Holocaust. This book is going on my summer reading list. The level of commitment to God in the face of such horror amazes me. Dealing with crisis as a religious person is difficult enough; as a community I cannot comprehend it.
2 thoughts on “PATRIOT Act refused. A truly patriotic act.”
Comments are closed.
Here’s a link to the story without the brain-dead cheerleading on American Street,
http://www.komotv.com/stories/33363.htm
And what’s the good news here, exactly? Civil liberties and law enforcement are at times competing interests, but neither is an absolute good. It’s not only wrong legally, but wrong practically, to argue that government in a criminal investigation may NEVER discover who checked out a book in a library, i.e. the library as “haven” theory. Why should a library become a haven for criminal activity because it’s a library?
On the other hand, more reasonable minds have argued that the issue with the Patriot Act amendments is that the provisions minimize or do away completely with judicial review. This, to my mind, is a plausible objection to some provisions of the Patriot Act amendments. This position asserts that libraries aren’t “havens,” but that government CAN discover who checked out a book upon application to a court with appropriate procedural protection (articulable facts that show the relevancy of the requested information to the investigation, etc.). Judicial review is a cardinal principle of due process in cases where such process is due.
Tony, I’m actually trying not to advocate “havens.” I know that when I make purchases with my credit card, those purchases can be tracked. I have entered into an implicit trade-off between my privacy and convenience. However, I do believe in the power of judicial oversight. I don’t expect this library to win the larger argument they are making about never having to release patron records, but I do hope that they help to get some of the provisions of the PATRIOT Act overturned. Any time there’s any resistance to this law, I think it’s a good thing.