See here. Friedman, like most commentators, acknowledges Sistani’s Shi’ism, but fails to understand what that means. “People power” as he describes is what the Ithna’shari conception of the state was/is prior to Khomeinism taking center stage. The idea of jurists leading the state, vilayat-e faqih, is a relatively new concept, but it’s already become normative for even op-ed writers who supposedly have the time to be able to think.
Related Posts
Let Freedom Ring/Reign/March; Just let it be Free
If we are a country of freedom; if we are hated for our freedoms; if freedom is on the march; if freedom reigns; why are we fighting a war on terror(ism)? Shouldn’t we be working towards freedom from fear?
I confess, I was amused
A friend was insulted, but doesn’t read the blog on a (semi-)regular basis. I think the real criticism is the hypocrisy of the Republicans, but you decide.
Terror[ism][ist][ize]
On the (mis)use of language.
6 thoughts on “Friedman on Sistani and the Nobel”
Comments are closed.
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus