See here. Friedman, like most commentators, acknowledges Sistani’s Shi’ism, but fails to understand what that means. “People power” as he describes is what the Ithna’shari conception of the state was/is prior to Khomeinism taking center stage. The idea of jurists leading the state, vilayat-e faqih, is a relatively new concept, but it’s already become normative for even op-ed writers who supposedly have the time to be able to think.
Related Posts
Being Poor
Read this. via here. Heartbreaking. Technorati Tags: Katrina
Fort Hood and the invisibility of Arab Americans
The role Arab-Americans play in the military: Consider Navy SEAL Mike Monsoor who threw himself on a grenade in Iraq on September 29, 2006. The device had landed among SEALs and Iraqi soldiers, and Monsoor absorbed the blast with his body, saving everyone’s life but his own. For his act of self sacrifice, he was posthumously awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor last year. Then there’s Lance Corporal Abraham al-Thaibani of New York who enlisted with the Marines after his city was attacked on 9/11. On the day the World Trade Center towers fell, al-Thaibani ran through the streets of…
Koran=Mein Kampf?
Apparently so: http://pub.tv2.no/nettavisen/english/article254421.ece
6 thoughts on “Friedman on Sistani and the Nobel”
Comments are closed.
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus
can we eat from Hindus or kafir
means food prepare by hindus