Read from my referrer here. This man is an Ottomanist who has become the most vocal interpreter of modern, Arab Islam in the US right now. It boggles the mind that he is considered an expert on the topics for which he is consulted – topics that affect whether or not we go to war. Even his medieval Arab history has been attacked as being slip shod and polemical.
Related Posts
At Least Its Not Janet
From the Associated Press Cairo, Egypt – Even before its first broadcast, a satellite television station financed by the U.S. government and directed at Arab viewers is drawing fire in the Middle East as an American attempt to destroy Islamic values and brainwash the young. Al-Hurra, or The Free One, is to start broadcasting Saturday. President Bush has promised the news station, which will build up to 24-hour programming within a month, will “cut through the hateful propaganda that fills the airwaves in the Muslim world.” It already has landed a one-on-one interview with Bush. White House Press Secretary Scott…
The Achievements of al Qaeda: Muslim World, Take Note
A suicide bomber some years back attacked a hotel in Amman, Jordan, killing among others Moustapha Akkad, producer of The Message — one of the noblest attempts to convey Islam as a faith of good and to elevate and publicize the reputation and character of Muhammad, peace be upon him. Yeah, that’s right: al-Qaeda killed Akkad. His daughter was also martyred during that attack. What has Umar Farouk my-last-name-is-haram Abdul-Muttallab accomplished or advanced? [From The Achievements of al Qaeda: Muslim World, Take Note]
McCain Loves Dead Americans
Let’s be clear, if you vote for McCain you may as well put up a bumper sticker that says “The only good American is a dead American.” His policies are guaranteed to result in more and more death, not only for Americans, but for people all around the world. I’m furious that he’s even considered a real candidate for the presidency. I offer as evidence of his blood-thirsty ignorance the following: McCain has repeatedly claimed that Iran is training Al-Qaeda. We heard this canard back in the run up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Let us be clear: AQ…
2 thoughts on “Yet more reasons not to like Bernard Lewis”
Comments are closed.
Many of Hirsh’s criticisms of Lewis are probably accurate. His area of expertese does not equip him to make political decisions; he is disconcertingly fond of Attaturk; he seems out-of-touch with modern day Arab and Muslim populations.
However, I think that this article misrepresents Lewis’ views in a number of respects. First, Lewis consistently depicts Wahhabiism as a radical fringe movement that has attained undue power with the help of Western governments acting in their own immediate economic and political self-interest. Like his critics, Lewis believes (or claims to believe) that Islam is fundamentally a moderate religion and that it need not be adverse to modernization.
Second, this article makes the common error of equating democracy with secularism. It is undeniable that secular dictatorships can be as brutal as religious dictatorships — Communist totalitarianism has proven that. On the other hand, democracy need not entail separation of church and state (as we have in the U.S.) or enforced secularism (as exists in France). Depending on their constitution, members of a democracy may be free to elect leaders who support religious institutions. On paper, at least, Lewis generally argues in favor of democracy and against totalitarianism, not in favor of secularism and against religious rule.
Finally, I think it unfair to assume that Lewis hates Arabs on the basis of his support of Israel. It is possible to be sympathetic to both sides of an unfortunate conflict. For his part, Lewis supports the creation of a democratic (not necessarily secular) Palestinian state, which he argues would be able to coexist peacefully with the democratic (not quite secular) state of Israel. His particular vision may or may not be misguided. Either way, Israel is not about to disappear, and any realistic vision for the future of the Middle East must incorporate the Jewish state in some form. To deny that reality is self-defeating.
elf, I grant you the first point. Lewis does relegate Wahhabism to the margins. However, like Daniel Pipes, he also seems to suggest that only good Muslim is a non-believing Muslim. So, I’m not sure what he would say about progressive Muslims (lowe-case “p,” so as not be confused with the movement).
Point two: true.
I agree the logic is faulty, but again, looking at the corpus of Lewis’ work, he clearly does not believe that Arab civilization has produced anything of value, and only by being totally “Western,” can the “Arab” become fully-realized humans. See for example “What Went Wrong?”