The Revealer on how Hamas is a faith-based initiative. Do people really not see Bush’s plan as being flawed Constitutionally, and in terms of building an American ideal, where everyone is thankful to America, not to the group around the corner?
Related Posts
Orrin Hatch Supports the Constitution, not Park51
Orrin Hatch Supports Building Of Park51: ‘I’d Be The First To Stand Up For Their Rights’. Hatch went on to add that as a legal scholar, “I have the tendency, when it comes to religious liberty issues, to always uphold the rights of legitimate churches… I just think that what’s made this country great is we have religious freedom. That’s not the only thing, but it’s one of the most important things in the Constitution.”
You’re not just voting for the President
I think it’s great that some people think they can have a beer with Bush or his cabinet…. But to be honest, I don’t want any of my current friends as POTUS (sorry guys and gals).
Boston beats New York
What a headline! This whole A-Rod trade has got Boston in an uproar, so I thought I’d give them a win over New York (namely me as the officially designated representative of the state.) I was working on a post about inclusion in the state, one which will probably still appear in some form, when today’s Boston Globe ran this op-ed about the French and the Bay Staters.
One thought on “When Religion and Social Justice can go Wrong”
Comments are closed.
Social Justice is generally liberalese for socialISM. There is nothing unconstitutional about Bush’s plan. I defy YOU to cite text of the US Constitution that supports you inane, contrafactual claim.
I’ll give you $5000 if you can show me where in the Constitution exists the misused phrase “separation of church and state”