The Revealer on how Hamas is a faith-based initiative. Do people really not see Bush’s plan as being flawed Constitutionally, and in terms of building an American ideal, where everyone is thankful to America, not to the group around the corner?
Related Posts
American Muslim Write Letter to #fthood shooter [humor]
Via the Onion. “thanks a fucking bunch, asshole,”
Torture and Cowardice, Pt.2
JMM hits it out of the park with this piece. Being bold means taking responsibility for being bold. As I’ve argued before, I think the answer to the ticking time bomb rationale for torture is this: that in the extremely unlikely circumstance that government officials ever found themselves in that position of having a ticking time bomb ticking away, they might have to make the decision to break the law. Not fudge it or keep their actions hidden, but take the decision on their own responsibility that it was the best thing to do in the situation — despite it…
Haroon Siddiqui Speech
Just read this. Interesting. Three things come to mind: I find it interesting that Mr. Siddiqui has to qualify his statements with the idea that he is not the follow of the Aga Khan, even though he is in front of a “progressive” audience, where being an Ismaili, or Ithna’ashari, or Sunni shouldn’t matter. He critiques the term “extermist” but speaks to a group called “progressive,” which continues to reassert the binary, although from a different direction. He begins talking about how aware Muslims around the world are of prison abuses. I don’t dispute this, but I wonder how the…
One thought on “When Religion and Social Justice can go Wrong”
Comments are closed.
Social Justice is generally liberalese for socialISM. There is nothing unconstitutional about Bush’s plan. I defy YOU to cite text of the US Constitution that supports you inane, contrafactual claim.
I’ll give you $5000 if you can show me where in the Constitution exists the misused phrase “separation of church and state”